The magistrates had correctly concluded that the relevant questioning was an interview within para.11.1(a) of code C of the codes of practice and that therefore the evidence was to be excluded since no caution had been given.

DC (Lord Bingham of Cornhill LCJ, Cresswell J)

11/05/1998

0 comments… add one

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Skip to toolbar