A social security commissioner had wrongly determined that the Social Security Appeal Tribunal had made an error of law in its decision as to whether a landlord had received overpayment of housing benefit as a result of a sham tenancy agreement and he had not been entitled to substitute his own decision on the facts.

[2005] EWCA Civ 178

0 comments… add one

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Skip to toolbar