Practice and Procedure

STATKEVICIUS v LITHUANIA (2011)

PUBLISHED October 12, 2011
SHARE

[2011] EWHC 2733 (Admin)

The district judge had correctly decided that the extradition of the appellant to Lithuania was not barred by reason of the passage of time within the meaning of the Extradition Act 2003 s.14. Whilst the requesting authority did not appear to have been assiduous in either the pursuit of the extradition or in providing entirely accurate information, the extradition would not be either unjust or oppressive.

QBD (Admin) (Hallett LJ DBE, McCombe J)

12/10/2011

CATEGORIES