The Crown Court had not erred in ruling, as inadmissible, the appellant's medical records but it had erred in dismissing the appeal, since it had failed to properly bear in mind that once the appellant had raised the issue of whether the analysing device had been working properly it was for the prosecution to show that it had been.

DC (Kennedy LJ, Butterfield J)

27/03/2000

0 comments… add one

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Skip to toolbar