Evidence of the name of an accused person's companion was not identification evidence, but was in fact circumstantial evidence from which the jury was invited to infer that the attacker was, in truth, the accused.

CA (Crim Div) (Potter LJ, Garland J, Judge Hyam)

19/04/2000

0 comments… add one

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Skip to toolbar