As long as the judge had made any weaknesses in the identification evidence clear to the jury there was no obligation to do so in a particular way.
CA (Crim Div) (Rose LJ, Holland J, Smith J)
Leave a Comment
Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.
This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.
Next post: R V PAUL DENSLOW (1998)
Previous post: R V N (1998)
Timely webcasts, analysis, updates and presentations about criminal law, practice and procedure. This channel allows listeners to learn about cutting-edge issues from leading practitioners and other professionals involved in criminal litigation.
Search the Archives
View Content by Category