[2007] EWCA Crim 2743

A custodial term of three years' imprisonment imposed on an appellant who pled guilty to counts of burglary and actual bodily harm was not manifestly excessive; however, the court was unable to spell out a basis for the judge's finding of dangerousness based on the appellant's pattern of offending and accordingly quashed that part of the sentence which imposed an extension period.

CA (Crim Div) (Gross J, Judge Patience QC)

30/10/2007

0 comments… add one

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Skip to toolbar