Practice and Procedure

R V NORMAL MICHAEL SAWTELL (2000)

PUBLISHED September 13, 2000
SHARE

A "statement made in pursuance of a requirement" within s.433(1)(b) Insolvency Act 1986 was a statement elicited by questions that might result in proceedings for contempt of court if not answered. On the facts, statements made by the defendant in response to questions from administrative receivers were inadmissible in criminal proceedings against him.

CA (Crim Div) (Rose LJ, Hallett J, Rafferty J)

13/09/2000

CATEGORIES