[2004] EWCA Crim 1832

The defendant's conviction for robbery was safe and delays by the police in investigating and taking a victim statement had not disadvantaged the defendant. Discrepancies in the identification evidence had been before the jury and the judge had summed up every point that could have been made on the defendant's behalf.

CA (Crim Div) (Maurice Kay LJ, Bell J)


0 comments… add one

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Skip to toolbar