It was open to the claimant to rely on a lesser defamatory meaning than his pleaded case and, on the determination of a preliminary issue, both the hardback and paperback editions of a book bore the meaning that there were cogent grounds to suspect that the claimant had abused his position as a police officer by colluding in the commission of substantial fraud.

[2005] EWHC 2187 (QB)

0 comments… add one

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Skip to toolbar