An appellant who had changed his plea to guilty on the admission of damning evidence against him could not have the conviction declared unsafe when the admission of the evidence had not prohibited the appellant from challenging or explaining the evidence.

CA (Crim Div) (Lord Bingham of Cornhill LCJ, Turner J, Penry-Davey J)


0 comments… add one

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Skip to toolbar