It was necessary that the evidence established that the owner had divested himself of control of a dog to the responsibility of another person as s.3(2) Dangerous Dogs Act 1991 operated only if there was plain evidence that the dog had been placed in the charge of someone other than the owner.

CA (Crim Div) (Pill LJ, Turner J, Judge Rant QC)


0 comments… add one

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Skip to toolbar