Practice and Procedure

R v (1) FS (2) NS (2013)

PUBLISHED February 15, 2013

[2013] EWCA Crim 248

Convictions for conspiracy to defraud were safe where, although the judge's written direction to the jury had not explicitly identified the requirement for dishonest intention referred to in R. v Saik (Abdulrahman) [2006] UKHL 18, [2007] 1 A.C. 18, he had made the requisite element of intention perfectly clear through other means.

CA (Crim Div) (Leveson LJ, Bean J, Judge Stokes QC)