The master had erred in refusing an adjournment so as to allow the claimant to deal with evidence served by the defendant close to the date of trial where there was not equality of arms between the parties and where the evidence served by the defendant required to be answered.

[2006] EWHC 231 (QB)

0 comments… add one

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Skip to toolbar