Practice and Procedure

KONRAD PILECKI v POLAND (2008)

PUBLISHED February 6, 2008
SHARE

[2008] UKHL 7

In a conviction case to which the Extradition Act 2003 s.65(3) applied, s.10(2), as modified for multiple offences, did not require the judge to ask whether the sentence that was passed for each offence in the warrant satisfied the test in s.65(3)(c). If the other requirements of s.65(3) were satisfied, all he needed to do was determine whether the sentence for the conduct taken as a whole met the requirement that it was for a term of at least four months. If it did, he must answer the question in s.10(2) in the affirmative.

HL (Lord Bingham of Cornhill, Lord Hope of Craighead, Lord Scott of Foscote, Lord Brown of Eaton-under-Heywood, Lord Neuberger of Abbotsbury)

06/02/2008

CATEGORIES