Practice and Procedure

CLIVE MARTIN BRECKON v DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS (2007)

PUBLISHED August 22, 2007
SHARE

[2007] EWHC 2013 (Admin)

There was no purpose in including within the approval for breathalyser machines every detail relating to the functioning of such a device and there had to be room to make sensible modifications without having to seek a new approval every time such a modification was made. The test was whether after such modification or alteration the machine remained one to which the description in the schedule to the approval document for breathalyser machines still properly applied.

DC (Sedley LJ, Nelson J)

22/08/2007

CATEGORIES